MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411292283 · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1553437

The impact of childhood emotional abuse on non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents with mood disorders: a moderated mediation model

2025· article· en· W4411292283 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lianzi Wang, Guifang Zha, Fangfang Chen, Jingyan Zhang, Xiaoyue Li, Ziliang Wang, Jia Luo, Chuanfu Song

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Psychiatry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMediationClinical psychologyPsychological abuseAlexithymiaPsychologyModerated mediationSuicidal ideationModerationPoison controlMoodMood disordersInjury preventionChild abusePsychiatryMedicineAnxiety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: This study aims to identify factors associated with NSSI severity in adolescents with mood disorders and examine the mediating role of emotional expression difficulties and the moderating role of bullying in the relationship between childhood emotional abuse and NSSI. Methods: Using a convenience sampling method, 242 adolescents with mood disorders were surveyed with the Adolescent Self-Harm Questionnaire, Childhood Abuse Questionnaire, Toronto Alexithymia Scale, and Beck Suicidal Ideation Scale. Stepwise linear regression was performed to examine associations between NSSI severity and key predictors, including childhood trauma subtypes, alexithymia, and bullying history. The mediation and moderation effects were tested using the Hayes Process plugin. Results: The prevalence of NSSI among adolescents with mood disorders was 81.40% (n = 197). Experiences of bullying (β=0.19, P=0.001), childhood emotional abuse (β=0.25, P<0.001), and difficulties in emotional expression (β=0.25, P<0.001) were positively correlated with the severity of NSSI, while age (β=-0.12, P=0.046) was negatively correlated. Difficulties in emotional expression partially mediated the relationship between childhood emotional abuse and NSSI, with a mediation effect size of 0.25, Bootstrap 95% CI (0.02-0.10), accounting for 21% of the total effect. This mediation effect was moderated by experiences of bullying, showing a positive association between the severity of NSSI and the interaction term of emotional expression difficulties and bullying (β=3.23, P<0.001), with a moderated mediation index of 0.48 and Bootstrap 95% CI (0.08-1.14). Conclusion: Childhood emotional abuse in adolescents with mood disorders can have both direct and indirect effects on NSSI through difficulties in emotional expression, and experiences of bullying moderate the relationship between NSSI and emotional expression difficulties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PsychiatrySame topicSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesFrench-language works237,207