MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A systemic study for decarbonizing secondary aluminium production via waste heat recovery, carbon management and renewable energy integration

2025· article· en· W4411300379 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Conversion and Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBauxite Residue and Utilization
Canadian institutionsNovelis (Canada)
FundersBundesamt für Energie
KeywordsRenewable energyWaste managementEnvironmental scienceProduction (economics)AluminiumEngineeringMaterials scienceMetallurgyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Secondary aluminium production relies on natural gas to transform both primary and recycled aluminium into semi-fabricated products, leading to significant atmospheric emissions, energy losses, and resource consumption. Despite the potential for waste heat recovery from stacks, casting water, and ancillary systems, wide-ranging temperature levels of waste heat produced complicate process integration. This work presents a systemic approach to enhance waste heat recovery, reduce fossil fuel consumption, integrate renewable energy resources, and use low-grade waste heat from a secondary aluminium plant to supply the heating requirements of a neighboring urban system. The goal is to highlight the role of process integration in decarbonizing and diversifying the industry’s energy requirements. A comprehensive techno-economic analysis evaluates decarbonization strategies, including, carbon capture, use, and sequestration; biomass energy conversion; oxycombustion furnaces; power-to-gas units; combined heat and power; heat pumps and seasonal storage units, considering energy prices, city demands, and seasonal variations . A systematic framework is employed to determine the most suitable decarbonization routes, while maintaining operational and financial feasibility. Results show that, carbon capture alone can only halve current CO 2 emissions (to 100 kg CO 2 /t Al ). Meanwhile integrated renewable electricity and biomass options achieve −200 kg CO 2 /t Al with 27% lower total energy and 40% less biomass use than biomass-only configurations. Power-to-gas systems without biomass import reduce emissions by only 80%, making them also unsuitable for net-zero targets. Finally, electricity self-generation of 30% of the overall power consumption can be achieved if the exothermic reaction enthalpy of carbon mineralization is recovered for various applications, such as biomass drying, steam generation, amine regeneration, and district heating. These findings highlight the need for a holistic approach that optimizes resource integration, minimizes emissions, and ensures long-term sustainability in secondary aluminium production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it