MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411301678 · doi:10.1139/er-2025-0080

Microplastics and ecosystem services: persistence, disruption mechanisms, and mitigation strategies

2025· article· en· W4411301678 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gokila Bagavathsingh, Jayanthi Duraisamy, Guruanand Chandrasekeran

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Reviews · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroplasticsPersistence (discontinuity)Environmental scienceEcosystemEcosystem servicesEcologyEnvironmental resource managementBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plastic pollution, driven by agricultural practices, industrial discharge, and urban runoff, poses a significant threat to soil ecosystems. Microplastics (MPs), plastic particles < 5 mm, disrupt key soil properties, including bulk density, aggregate stability, water retention, and microbial activity. MPs alter enzyme functions, microbial diversity, and soil fauna, such as earthworms, thereby affecting nutrient cycling and plant-microbe interactions. Here, we review the impacts of MPs on soil ecosystems and discuss sustainable mitigation strategies, including microbial and enzymatic biodegradation, biodegradable plastics, and improved waste management. Legislative frameworks, such as India’s Plastic Waste Management Rules and the UN Global Plastics Treaty, aim to reduce plastic waste through extended producer responsibility, waste-to-energy solutions, and circular economy approaches. An interdisciplinary approach is essential to effectively mitigate the enduring ecological risks posed by microplastics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental ReviewsSame topicMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionFrench-language works237,207