MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411312009 · doi:10.53762/44ywhy68

10.53762/44ywhy68

2000· article· en· W4411312009 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zahid Hussain, Muhammad Arshad Dahar

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationPsychologyPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research was conducted to investigate the “impact of teachers’ behavior on students’ motivation and learning at the elementary school level." Teachers behave well to create a positive and supportive classroom learning environment. Teachers’ conduct can influence students’ motivation and learning in many ways. The objectives of the study were: 1) to identify the impact of teachers’ behavior on students’ motivation; and 2) to identify the impact of teachers’ behavior on students’ learning. The nature of the study was a mixed-methods design. The study was limited to the district of Rajanpur, male elementary schools, 6th, 7th, and 8th grades only. The target population of the study was all the elementary public school’s teachers and students in the district of Rajanpur. The sample of the study was 433 elementary school male students and 10 elementary school male teachers. The respondents were selected through a simple random sampling technique. A self-developed, closed-ended questionnaire for students and an interview protocol for teachers were developed by the researcher. The questionnaire and interview were finalized after conducting a pilot test. The students’ questionnaire was designed on a five-point Likert scale. The Cronbach alpha reliability was 0.885. The data was collected, organized, tabulated, and analyzed using percentage, mean, standard deviation, chi square, and Pearson correlation through SPSS version 29.0. The findings of the study were based on objectives. It was found that teachers positive and friendly behavior at the elementary school level impacted students’ motivation and learning positively. According to the salient conclusion of the study, teachers create an inclusive and positive learning environment through their kind behavior. Most students were more engaged and enthusiastic about their teachers’ cooperative classroom environment. Most of the teachers were well aware of the positive atmosphere in the classroom and provided standard teaching methodologies for elementary students. The study recommended that elementary school-level teachers show kind behavior in the classroom for better academic outcomes for the students. It was recommended that teachers create a positive classroom environment by paying extra attention to their students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9850.978

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicTechnology-Enhanced Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207