MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411313259 · doi:10.1101/2025.06.13.655622

An open dataset of cerebral tau deposition in young healthy adults based on [ <sup>18</sup> F]MK6240 positron emission tomography

2025· preprint· en· W4411313259 on OpenAlexafffund
Jack Lam, Raúl Rodríguez‐Cruces, Thaera Arafat, Jessica Royer, Judy Chen, Arielle Dascal, Ella Sahlas, Raluca Pana, Robert Hopewell, Chris Hsiao, Gassan Massarweh, Jean‐Paul Soucy, Sylvia Villeneuve, Lorenzo Caciagli, Matthias J. Koepp, Andrea Bernasconi, Neda Bernasconi, Boris C. Bernhardt

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalCanadian Open Neuroscience PlatformAzrieli FoundationBrain Research UKFondation Brain Canada
KeywordsPositron emission tomographyPositronBrain positron emission tomographyDeposition (geology)Nuclear medicinePositron emissionPhysicsNuclear physicsMedicinePreclinical imagingGeologyElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Tauopathies are pathologies wherein phosphorylated insoluble tau aggregates in neurons, leading to dysfunction and degeneration. Positron emission tomography (PET) enables measurement of in vivo tau, with second-generation radiotracers such as [ 18 F]MK6240 showing high tau affinity with minimal off-target binding. While tauopathies are commonly linked to age-related neurodegenerative diseases, notably Alzheimer’s disease (AD), evidence suggests pathophysiological cascades may begin long before clinical onset. Increasingly, tau is recognized in pathologies affecting younger individuals, including autosomal dominant AD, Niemann-Pick disease type C, chronic traumatic encephalopathy, and epilepsy, thus highlighting the importance of normative data in non-geriatric populations. Here, we present a dataset of 33 young to middle-age healthy adults (mean age 34.0±10.4 years, 12 female) with [ 18 F]MK6240 PET data and T1w magnetic resonance imaging. Longitudinal data are also available in a subset of 9 participants with a minimum follow-up time of 1 year. Our dataset aims to support imaging biomarker studies on younger individuals potentially at risk for AD and to advance work in tauopathies affecting non-geriatric populations generally excluded from neurodegeneration studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207