MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411320576 · doi:10.5376/jtsr.2024.14.0027

Structural Variations in Tea Genome and Their Role in Trait Diversity

2024· article· en· W4411320576 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chuchu Liu, Xichen Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Tea Science Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFermentation and Sensory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraitDiversity (politics)Evolutionary biologyGenomeBiologyGeneticsSociologyComputer scienceGeneAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tea (Camellia sinensis) has important economic and cultural significance.The tea aroma, taste and even morphological diversity that everyone is familiar with are actually related to the genomic mechanisms behind it.With the release of high-quality reference genomes and the construction of the pan-genome of tea, more than 217,000 structural variations (SVs) and 56,000 presence/absence variations (PAVs) have been identified.This study analyzed the types and distribution of these SVs and their roles in secondary metabolism, stress resistance, morphological traits, etc.By integrating SV data with multi-omics data such as transcriptome and metabolome, we found that the expression of many key traits is indeed affected by SV regulation.Some SVs directly affect whether genes are expressed or change the location of regulatory elements, thereby promoting the evolution of certain traits.SVs are expected to become targets for trait improvement and are gradually showing their potential for application in molecular breeding.This study provides a more solid theoretical basis and technical support for the precision breeding and genetic resource protection of tea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Tea Science ResearchSame topicFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207