MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411324601 · doi:10.53762/0aqe8y71

10.53762/0aqe8y71

2000· article· en· W4411324601 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kaleem Ullah, Saleem Ullah

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The tax fixed by the government on import and export of goods is called customs. During the time of Hazrat Umar (R.A), the governments of Iran and Rome had a constitution that whenever Muslims entered the borders of traders for trade, they used to collect fixed taxes from them. But when non-Muslim traders entered the Islamic State, no tax was collected from them, which would have caused trade deficit for the citizens of the Islamic State and non-Muslims would have been protected from this deficit. In this regard Hazrat Umar (may Allah have mercy on him) sent an order to the Governors saying: "Receive from them as much as they receive from Muslim traders. Take half a decade from the dhimmi and receive a dirham from the Muslims every forty dirhams, and there is nothing less than 200 dirhams. When the two hundred dirhams arrive, there are five dirhams in them, and when there are more than 200, receive it accordingly. Hazrat Umar suggested to continue trading between non-Muslims and Muslims and also to impose Ashure (tax) on them. However, it was given that the trader from who tax (Ashure) should be collected once a year should not be taken again from any number of times in the year after that. What is the difference between the Ashure of the time of Hazrat Umar (R.A) and today's tax is called customs duty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9830.985

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207