Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article is intended to describe the rules and reasons for the privilege of men's supervisory role. Islam has established equality between men and women in all matters and has fairly divided the rights and responsibilities so that the institution of the family can run properly. Along with defining the roles of both men and women Islam has imposed the responsibility of supervisory as the caretaker and head of the family on men. So that he supervises all the affairs of the family recognizes their rights and manages to protect them. And maintain family discipline. But unfortunately, it has been considered an injustice to women that men have sovereign rights over women. And thus, he oppresses the woman. A woman can neither raise her voice to protest him nor can she escape him. The concept that is established about the status of men is the result of not understanding Islamic teachings. While man has been declared superior to women by Allah in various respects and the right of leadership in Islam is only granted to him. It is quite a fair decision in the favor of woman. In this article, an attempt has been made to clarify the wisdom of male supervisory and leadership and his superior status in the Islamic family system with a feminist approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.976 | 0.971 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".