Bibliographic record
Abstract
Knowledge belongs to various fields, which discuss the social, political, natural and material aspects of any society. There are two theories about social sciences; Islamic Theory and Secular or Western Theory. These theories reflect the social background of any society. Ethical values carry primary importance in educational system. With their development, contemporary social sciences have laid huge impact on not only non-Muslim individuals, but some Muslim intellectuals have also fallen prey to their sententious impact. In result, Muslim scholars feel proud after getting educated from contemporary social sciences. But, being devoid of spiritual impact, contemporary social sciences have led them to the way where neither God has any place nor the ethical values have any importance. Since the importance of contemporary social sciences, in current scenario, cannot be denied, the Muslim scholars and intellectuals have shown serious concern in this matter. They have different view points on whether the Muslims should derivate and utilize the contemporary social sciences or not. There has been a lot of debate and discussion on the issue of Islamization of modern social sciences among the Muslim intellectuals also. This article aims at the need and challenges being faced in Islamizing contemporary social sciences. The discussion will be made on how the unislamic elements of contemporary social sciences can be Islamized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.996 | 0.982 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".