MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411327644 · doi:10.1017/s0885715625100808

A proposed crystal structure of fruquintinib Form I, C <sub>21</sub> H <sub>19</sub> N <sub>3</sub> O <sub>5</sub>

2025· article· en· W4411327644 on OpenAlexfundno aff
James A. Kaduk, Anja Došen, Thomas N. Blanton

Bibliographic record

VenuePowder Diffraction · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and biological activity
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInternational Centre for Diffraction Data
KeywordsMaterials scienceCrystallographyCrystal structureCrystal (programming language)ChemistryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The crystal structure of fruquintinib Form I has been solved and refined using synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction data and optimized using density functional theory techniques. Fruquintinib Form I crystallizes in space group C2 (#5) with a = 35.4167(22), b = 3.90500(12), c = 26.9370(11) Å, β = 108.0290(22)°, V = 3,542.52(26) Å 3 , and Z = 8 at 298 K. The crystal structure consists of double layers of each of the two independent molecules parallel to the ab -plane. These layers stack along the short b -axis. N–H···N hydrogen bonds link the layers. Most of the C–H···N and C–H···O hydrogen bonds are intramolecular. The powder pattern has been submitted to ICDD for inclusion in the Powder Diffraction File ™ (PDF ® ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePowder DiffractionSame topicSynthesis and biological activityFrench-language works237,207