Wastewater‐Based Epidemiology as a Complementary Tool for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance: Overcoming Barriers to Integration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This commentary highlights the potential of wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) as a complementary tool for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance. WBE can support the early detection of resistance trends at the population level, including in underserved communities. However, several challenges remain, including technical variability, complexities in data interpretation, and regulatory gaps. An additional limitation is the uncertainty surrounding the origin of resistant bacteria and their genes in wastewater, which may derive not only from human sources but also from industrial, agricultural, or infrastructural contributors. Therefore, effective integration of WBE into public health systems will require standardized methods, sustained investment, and cross-sector collaboration. This could be achieved through joint monitoring initiatives that combine hospital wastewater data with agricultural and municipal surveillance to inform antibiotic stewardship policies. Overcoming these barriers could position WBE as an innovative tool for AMR monitoring, enhancing early warning systems and supporting more responsive, equitable, and preventive public health strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.089 | 0.173 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.018 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.014 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".