MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411336598 · doi:10.1109/ojcs.2025.3580107

BOL-LPP: A Bayesian-Optimized LSTM Model for Day-Ahead Load Price Forecasting in the ERCOT Market

2025· article· en· W4411336598 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayesian probabilityComputer scienceEconometricsArtificial intelligenceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Precise short-term load price forecasting is critical for uninterrupted and efficient power-system operation and energy-market performance. Although machine-learning techniques have been widely employed to predict market prices, achieving reliable day-ahead load price forecasts remains challenging in practice, especially in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) energy-only market. This paper targets sufficiently accurate day-ahead load price prediction for ERCOT's zonal markets by modeling historical load, price, and weather data with a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network whose hyperparameters are tuned via Bayesian Optimization (BO). The resulting Bayesian-Optimized LSTM for load price Prediction (BOL-LPP) is evaluated against classical statistical and deep-learning baselines. On the North-zone test set, BOL-LPP attains a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\$}$</tex-math></inline-formula>0.0044/MWh, cutting the MAE by 32% relative to the strongest deep baseline (BiLSTM, MAE of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\$}$</tex-math></inline-formula>0.0065/MWh) and by over 99% compared with SARIMAX. Its MAE remains below <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\$}$</tex-math></inline-formula>0.006/MWh on the Coast and South zones, confirming robust generalization. These numerical results, along with the reported Mean Squared Error (MSE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), validate the performance gains delivered by the proposed model. BOL-LPP therefore promises markedly improved short-term load price forecasts, supporting informed decision-making and enhanced operational efficiency in the ERCOT market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it