MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimizing Grid-Forming Wind Turbines Share for Frequency Regulation and LOLF Reduction in Modern Power Systems

2025· article· en· W4411337413 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Seyed Amir Hosseini, Saeed Peyghami

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPower Systems and Renewable Energy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind powerReduction (mathematics)GridPower gridComputer sciencePower (physics)Electrical engineeringEngineeringGeologyPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores the optimal proportion of grid forming wind turbines (GFM-WTs) necessary for effective participation in frequency regulation during power system disturbances, with the aim of minimizing the loss of load frequency (LOLF) index. To achieve this, the security constrained unit commitment (SCUC) problem is first formulated and then solved to determine the dispatch of conventional and wind power plants. Then a generation unit for failure is selected based on predefined failure and repair rates. Wind turbines are categorized into grid following wind turbines (GFL-WTs), which do not contribute to frequency regulation, and GFM-WTs, which operate slightly below their maximum capacity to provide additional power support when needed. The Hydro-Québec controller is applied to GFM-WTs for frequency recovery. A Monte Carlo simulation is employed to assess the number of events in which the system frequency falls below 49.5 Hz, indicating an unstable power system that leads to load shedding. The optimal percentage of GFM-WTs is determined as the configuration that minimizes the LOLF index. The proposed methodology is implemented on the IEEE 24-bus reliability test system, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing frequency stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems and Renewable EnergyFrench-language works237,207