FAUST
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Context. During the early stages of star formation, accretion processes such as infall from the envelope and molecular streamers and ejection of matter through winds and jets take place simultaneously and distribute the angular momentum of the parent molecular cloud. The Class 0/I binary [BHB2007] 11 shows evidence for accretion and ejection at the scales of the circumbinary disk and the inner close binary. Recent observations of H 2 CO, however, have shown two elongated structures with indications of outflowing motion almost perpendicular to the main CO outflow, which is launched from the circumbinary disk. Aims. We study the kinematics of the molecular gas at intermediate scales of ~50–3000 au around [BHB2007] 11 to verify the nature of these elongated structures. Methods. We analyzed the line emission of H 13 CO + , CCH, c-C 3 H 2 , and SiO observed with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) within the large program called Fifty AU STudy of the chemistry in the disc/envelope system of Solar-like protostars (FAUST). These molecules trace the material that moves at velocities close to that of the ambient cloud, which could not be probed in previous observations of the self-absorbed emission of CO. Results. The images of H 13 CO + , CCH, and c-C 3 H 2 show clear elongated structures similar to those previously detected in H 2 CO, whose gas kinematics are consistent with outflowing motions and with rotation in the opposite sense to the main CO outflow. The derived mass-loss rate from these large-scale structures is (1.7 ± 0.5) × 10 −6 M ⊙ yr −1 , which agrees with the rates measured in outflows driven by Class 0/I protostars. The SiO image reveals compact emission close to the binary system, with a slight elongation that is aligned with the larger-scale structures. This suggests that SiO is released from the sputtering of dust grains in the shocked material at the base of the potential new outflow, with a relative abundance of ≥(0.11–2.0) × 10 −9 . However, higher angular and spectral resolution observations are needed to accurately estimate the outflow-launching radius and its powering source. Based on the location and the abundance of the SiO emission, we propose that the second outflow may be launched from inside the circumbinary disk, likely by the less massive companion that actively accretes material from its surroundings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".