Sensor-Based Rock Hardness Characterization in a Gold Mine Using Hyperspectral Imaging and Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Technologies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rock hardness significantly impacts comminution efficiency, one of mining’s most energy-intensive processes. Accurate, rapid, and non-invasive hardness characterization can enhance mine-to-mill optimization and energy management. This study investigates sensor-based technologies, hyperspectral imaging, and portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) integrated with machine learning (ML) algorithms for characterizing rock hardness in open-pit gold mining contexts. A total of 159 rock samples from two Canadian open-pit gold mines were analyzed through Leeb rebound hardness (LRH), short-wave infrared (SWIR) hyperspectral imaging, and a pXRF analyzer for chemical characterization. The most critical spectral features of SWIR images were extracted using a novel and automated feature extraction approach and further refined by applying a recursive feature elimination (RFE) algorithm to reduce the dimensionality of the spectral feature space. Three ML algorithms, including Random Forest Regressor (RFR), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), and Multivariate Linear Regression (MLR), were applied to develop predictive hardness models considering three scenarios: using chemical features, using refined spectral features, and their combination. The findings underscore the potential of advanced sensor integration and analytics in remotely characterizing rock hardness, which could contribute to enhancing efficiency and sustainability in modern mining operations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".