MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411344886 · doi:10.1177/03128962251340328

The silence of the slacked: The negative side effect of slack on problemistic search

2025· article· en· W4411344886 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Journal of Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEthics in Business and Education
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersIvey Business School, Western University
KeywordsSilenceEconomicsPsychologyBusinessAdvertisingSocial psychologyPhilosophyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organizational slack is associated with various positive effects on the organization. By focusing on slack’s cushioning property, which shields the firm from external adversities, this article discusses how slack can also mute important external stimuli for problemistic search and increase adverse self-enhancement effects when an organization performs below aspirations. We use panel data on publicly traded firms to test how shareholder voice affects problemistic search and how slack negatively moderates this relationship. We also show that problemistic search suffers more in self-enhancing firms as a firm’s slack increases. We contribute to the behavioral theory of the firm by unfolding the negative side of slack and demonstrating how differentiation between internal and external coalition perspectives unfolds new sides of this concept. JEL Classification: L20, M10

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it