MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Bicubic trigonometric B-Spline Approach for Solving the Nonlinear Generalized 2D Burger's Equation

2025· article· en· W4411345222 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bewar A. Mahmood

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Analysis and Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsBicubic interpolationTrigonometryB-splineNonlinear systemApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisCalculus (dental)Pure mathematicsOrthodonticsLinear interpolation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonlinear reaction-diffusion problems, such as the nonlinear generalized two-dimensional Burgers’ equation, play a crucial role in various fields, including developmental biology, population dynamics, engineering, and physics. This study focuses on the numerical solution of the two-dimensional Burgers’ equation using a collocation method based on bicubic trigonometric B-spline functions combined with a θ-weighted scheme. The spatial and temporal domains are discretized using bicubic trigonometric B-spline functions and a finite difference approach, respectively. The nonlinear terms in the equation are handled through quasilinearization. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated by simulating some test problems with different initial and boundary conditions. The influence of various reaction terms is analyzed and presented in both tabular and graphical formats. Moreover, using the Von Neumann stability analysis, the proposed scheme is shown to be conditionally stable. The results indicate that the present method is highly effective for solving nonlinear partial differential equations arising in a wide range of scientific and engineering applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Analysis and ApplicationsSame topicFractional Differential Equations SolutionsFrench-language works237,207