Imagens midiáticas no ensino da arte: reflexões a partir das diretrizes curriculares do Brasil e do Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O artigo tem por objetivo discutir o potencial das imagens midiáticas no ensino da arte, em especial a imagem publicitária, a partir das diretrizes curriculares do Brasil e do Quebec, refletindo sobre as contribuições e limitações encontradas nesses documentos. Primeiramente, o texto discorre sobre a importância de incentivar um olhar sensível e crítico diante das imagens midiáticas que circulam no cotidiano dos estudantes. Em seguida, são verificados a Base Nacional Comum Curricular (BNCC) (Brasil, 2017), documento oficial vigente que norteia a educação brasileira, e o Programa de formação da escola quebequense (PFEQ) (Québec, 2007), tendo em vista a relevância atribuída às imagens midiáticas no processo de ensino das artes visuais. Compreende-se que é fundamental que o ensino da arte incorpore práticas didáticas e pedagógicas de apreciação que favoreçam a percepção, a reflexão crítica e criativa dos estudantes, permitindo que eles se apropriem das imagens midiáticas e as compreendam como agentes de produção de sentido.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".