MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411347960 · doi:10.18280/mmep.120511

Design of Sectional Antenna for High-Speed Data Transmission in 6G Applications

2025· article· en· W4411347960 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mary Joy Kinol Alphonse, Marshiana Devaerakkkam, D. Godwin Immanuel, C. F. Theresa Cenate

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmission (telecommunications)Computer scienceAntenna (radio)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing need for high-performance antennas in 5G and 6G communication systems calls for creative designs that tackle issues with voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) and signal transmission efficiency.To reduce losses and improve signal transmission, this paper proposes a metamaterial-based Pa-type slot antenna that is suitable for millimeter-wave frequencies.The proposed antenna has a return loss of -18.2404 dB, -18.5977 dB, and -22.3190 dB over a frequency range of 1 GHz to 6 GHz at resonance frequencies of 2.4 GHz, 3.4 GHz, and 5 GHz, respectively.It also maintains a VSWR of 1.2280, which ensures the effective transfer of power and minimizes signal reflection.Due to these developments, which indicate remarkable gains in signal transmission performance, it offers a promising answer to the demanding needs of 5G and 6G applications.This study demonstrates how designs based on metamaterials have the potential to propel the creation of next-generation wireless communication systems.For maximum radiation efficiency, gain, and bandwidth for ultra-high-speed data communications, your research develops a sectional antenna design.The design is built to provide high performance in 6G networks by reducing signal loss using new structural and material optimization.The model differs from traditional ones, which are ultra-high-speed and low-latency communication optimized for future network needs.In addition, the designed antenna is conveniently integrated into complex multi-input multi-output (MIMO) settings, which optimizes efficiency and spatial multiplexing in dense network settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207