MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411348194 · doi:10.2196/71229

A Machine Learning–Based Prognostication Model Enhances Prediction of Early Hepatic Encephalopathy in Patients With Noncancer-Related Cirrhosis: Multicenter Longitudinal Cohort Study in Taiwan

2025· article· en· W4411348194 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yiu-Hua Cheng, Wei-Chung Yeh, Yi-Wen Tsai

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintMedicineHepatocellular cancerHepatic encephalopathyCohortArea under curveCancerInternal medicineComputer scienceCirrhosisWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) contributes significantly to mortality among patients with liver cirrhosis. Early prediction of HE is essential for clinical decision-making, yet remains challenging-particularly in noncancer-related cirrhosis due to the unpredictable disease course. Objective: This study aimed to develop a novel machine learning (ML) model to improve early prediction of HE in patients with noncancer-related cirrhosis. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2010 to December 2017 across all Chang Gung Memorial Hospital branches in northern, middle, and southern Taiwan. We applied several ML models to evaluate HE predictability and compared their performance in the training dataset and testing dataset. Optimal sensitivity and specificity were determined using the Youden index. The best ML model was interpreted by the Shapley Additive Explanations plot. Results: A total of 5878 patients with cirrhosis were included in the analysis, of whom 1187 (20.2%) subsequently developed HE. Compared to the non-HE group, patients with HE were older (median age 55, IQR 46-65 vs median age 54, IQR 44-66 years; P=.04) and had higher rates of hepatitis B virus infection (351/1187, 30% vs 961/4691, 20.5%; P<.001), alcohol use (540/1187, 45.5% vs 1512/4691, 32.2%; P<.001), sepsis (393/1187, 33.1% vs 792/4691, 16.9%; P<.001), and mortality (425/1187, 35.8% vs 502/4691, 10.7%; P<.001), along with distinct laboratory abnormalities reflecting liver dysfunction. Among the ML algorithms evaluated, the extreme gradient boosting algorithm demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.88) in the testing dataset. This performance was significantly superior to that of the neural network (AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.76-0.81; P<.001), support vector machine (AUC 0.77, 95% CI 0.73-0.80; P<.001), and the model for end-stage liver disease score (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.71-0.77; P<.001). Using a probability threshold of 0.25, the extreme gradient boosting model demonstrated a sensitivity of 72% (95% CI 0.67-0.77), specificity of 80% (95% CI 0.78-0.82), a positive predictive value of 48% (95% CI 43-53), and a negative predictive value of 92% (95% CI 90-94) in the testing set. Comparable performance was observed in the training dataset, with a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI 0.77-0.83), specificity of 81% (95% CI 0.80-0.82), and a negative predictive value of 94% at the same threshold. The most influential predictive variables identified by the model included serum ammonia, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, prothrombin time, and serum potassium. Conclusions: We developed a novel ML model for predicting HE in patients with noncancer-related cirrhosis. This model provides a practical guide to help physicians and these patients in shared decision-making regarding treatment strategy, with the ultimate goal of improving clinical care and reducing the burden of HE-related morbid complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Medical InformaticsSame topicLiver Disease and TransplantationFrench-language works237,207