MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411357427 · doi:10.53762/caf0fh85

10.53762/caf0fh85

2000· article· en· W4411357427 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Ghazi Abdul Rehman Qasmi, Sobia Khan, Dr Muhammad Husnain

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and History
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Islam is a religion of comprehensive and inclusive teachings and is a source of guidance and enlightenment for humans till the day of judgement. Allah sent prophets to spread the message of Islam among human race. Hazrat Adam (A.S) commended the preaching of Dīn, the latter prophets and messengers continued it and the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) marked the completion of this message of Dīn. From the period of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) thus far, the process of the preaching of Dīn never discontinued. However, the preachers, adopted various methodologies to spread the message. Some literati broadened the message though pen and others through speeches. Some preached Islam though their doings and actions and others adopted mysticism to spread the message of Dīn. The following research paper discusses about the types of Islamic preaching, fundamentals, conditions, methodologies and understanding in current era.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9940.975

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicIslamic Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207