MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Integrated Process Planning and Scheduling Using an Optimized Rule-Mining Approach for Smart Manufacturing

2025· preprint· en· W4411357825 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Syeda Marzia, Ahmed Azab, Alejandro Vital-Soto

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Process (computing)Smart manufacturingManufacturing engineeringIndustrial engineeringEngineeringOperations managementOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manufacturing industries are undergoing a significant transformation towards Smart Manufacturing (SM) to cater to the ever-evolving demands of customized products. A major obstacle in this transition is the integration of Computer-Aided Process Planning (CAPP) with Scheduling. This integration poses challenges because of conflicting objectives that must be balanced, resulting in the Integrated Process Planning and Scheduling problem. In response to these challenges, our research introduces a novel hybridized machine learning-optimization approach designed to assign and sequence setups in Dynamic Flexible Job Shop environments via dispatching rule mining, accounting for real-time disruptions such as machine breakdowns. This approach seeks to bridge the gap between CAPP and scheduling by treating setups as dispatching units, ultimately minimizing makespan and bolstering manufacturing flexibility. The problem is modeled as a Dynamic Flexible Job Shop problem, and it is tackled through a comprehensive methodology that combines mathematical programming, heuristic techniques, and the creation of a robust dataset for data mining, which captures attributes reflecting priority relationships among setups. Empirical results validate the effectiveness of our methodology, demonstrating that the mining model surpasses classical dispatching rules. Furthermore, our model exhibits robust generalization capabilities in the context of SM, paving the way for more efficient and adaptive production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePreprints.orgSame topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207