MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411358050 · doi:10.7202/1116395ar

Quel regard le personnel enseignant en arts plastiques porte-t-il sur l’éco-éducation artistique ?

2024· article· fr· W4411358050 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueNouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicSustainable Design and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article présente les résultats préliminaires d’une recherche exploratoire de type qualitatif menée au Québec auprès de personnes enseignantes. Cette recherche permet d’interroger les liens à établir – à leurs yeux – entre l’art et l’éducation relative à l’environnement (ERE) pour répondre aux exigences éducatives contemporaines. Les données ont été recueillies auprès de 14 personnes spécialistes en arts plastiques qui enseignent à l’école primaire ou secondaire. L’objectif est de comprendre, à travers ses représentations, ses savoirs et ses vécus, quel est le regard du personnel enseignant sur les interférences possibles entre les arts plastiques et l’ERE et, par extension, sur le potentiel éducatif (et transformatif) de l’art à l’école.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it