Quel regard le personnel enseignant en arts plastiques porte-t-il sur l’éco-éducation artistique ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article présente les résultats préliminaires d’une recherche exploratoire de type qualitatif menée au Québec auprès de personnes enseignantes. Cette recherche permet d’interroger les liens à établir – à leurs yeux – entre l’art et l’éducation relative à l’environnement (ERE) pour répondre aux exigences éducatives contemporaines. Les données ont été recueillies auprès de 14 personnes spécialistes en arts plastiques qui enseignent à l’école primaire ou secondaire. L’objectif est de comprendre, à travers ses représentations, ses savoirs et ses vécus, quel est le regard du personnel enseignant sur les interférences possibles entre les arts plastiques et l’ERE et, par extension, sur le potentiel éducatif (et transformatif) de l’art à l’école.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".