Unsupervised Seismic Erratic Noise Suppression Using Implicit Neural Representation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seismic erratic noise, characterized by large isolated events following non-Gaussian distributions, significantly degrades seismic data quality by masking useful signals. Methods based on conventional priors remain essential but face inherent challenges as they struggle to balance noise attenuation and signal preservation. Supervised deep learning approaches are constrained by the scarcity of high-quality labeled training pairs, while existing unsupervised techniques often suffer from suboptimal accuracy and high computational cost. To address these limitations, we propose an unsupervised deep learning framework based on implicit neural representation (INR) for erratic noise suppression in seismic data. The proposed method employs Fourier feature mapping to encode the spatial coordinates of noisy seismic data, which are then processed by a lightweight multilayer perceptron (MLP). The MLP is optimized using a robust Huber loss function to learn a continuous representation of the underlying seismic wavefield, effectively attenuating erratic noise while preserving valuable signal components. The Fourier feature mapping enhances the MLP’s ability to capture high-frequency signal details, while the Huber loss adaptively weights residuals based on amplitude, enabling precise noise suppression. Experimental results on synthetic and field datasets demonstrate its superior performance in suppressing noise while preserving signal fidelity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".