MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411360172 · doi:10.1016/j.bulsci.2025.103684

A new formal series method and its application to the center problem in Z2-equivariant nilpotent vector fields

2025· article· en· W4411360172 on OpenAlexafffund
Feng Li, Yusen Wu, Ting Chen, Pei Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin des Sciences Mathématiques · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEquivariant mapNilpotentCenter (category theory)Series (stratigraphy)MathematicsPure mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, center problems and bifurcation of limit cycles are considered for Z 2 -equivariant nilpotent vector fields. A new formal series method is developed for computing the focal values of the vector fields, which can be conveniently implemented using a computer algebraic system. As an application, the new method is applied to classify the centers for a class of quintic-order systems, which contains four conditions associated with a nilpotent singular point at the origin and two center conditions associated with an elementary center at infinity. Moreover, eight small-amplitude limit cycles in the neighborhood of the origin and nine large-amplitude limit cycles at infinity are obtained. This is the first time to investigate the synchronous bifurcation problem associated with a nilpotent singular point at the origin and a Hopf singular point at infinity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin des Sciences MathématiquesSame topicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical SystemsFrench-language works237,207