Machine Learning Efforts That Enhance Personalized Patient Care and Chronic Disease Management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The growing burden of chronic diseases has underscored the urgent need for personalized, data-driven approaches to healthcare delivery. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a transformative technology capable of enhancing chronic disease management through predictive analytics, real-time monitoring, and individualized treatment optimization. This review examines the role of ML in advancing personalized patient care by exploring foundational techniques such as supervised and unsupervised learning, deep neural networks, and reinforcement learning. It highlights practical applications across diabetes, cardiovascular conditions, respiratory disorders, and cancer survivorship, emphasizing the value of ML in risk prediction, medication adjustment, and remote monitoring. Additionally, the paper discusses key enablers of personalized care, including patient stratification, precision dosing, and the integration of wearable devices and digital platforms. Emerging innovations such as federated learning, explainable AI, multimodal data fusion, and digital twin systems are explored for their potential to support secure, transparent, and context-aware healthcare delivery. The review also addresses critical challenges related to bias, data privacy, clinical integration, and regulatory oversight. Ultimately, this work advocates for a multidisciplinary framework that combines technological innovation with policy reform to ensure equitable, scalable, and sustainable deployment of machine learning in personalized chronic disease care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".