Diagnostic and prognostic value of α-synuclein seed amplification assay kinetic measures in Parkinson's disease: a longitudinal cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: α-synuclein seed amplification assay (SAA) positivity has been proposed as a diagnostic biomarker for Parkinson's disease. However, studies of the prognostic value of this biomarker have been limited to small, single-centre studies over short follow-up periods. We aimed to assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of quantitative CSF α-synuclein SAA kinetic measures in Parkinson's disease. METHODS: In this longitudinal cohort study, we collected and analysed data from participants with Parkinson's disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, and healthy controls enrolled in three cohorts: the UK parkinsonism cohort, the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) international observational study, and the Tübingen Parkinson's disease cohort. Baseline CSF α-synuclein SAA data and longitudinal clinical data were collected between Jan 1, 2005, and Nov 1, 2023. The following seeding kinetic measures were calculated from the α-synuclein SAA curve for each SAA-positive sample: time to threshold (TTT) for a positive SAA result; maximum Thioflavin T fluorescence during the reaction time (MaxThT); and area under the fluorescence curve during the reaction time (AUC). We compared seeding kinetic measures between sporadic Parkinson's disease and progressive supranuclear palsy, and between sporadic Parkinson's disease and monogenic Parkinson's disease. We used time-to-event analyses to assess the ability of α-synuclein SAA kinetic measures to predict an unfavourable outcome in Parkinson's disease, adjusting for sex, age, and disease duration at SAA testing. FINDINGS: We analysed data from 1631 participants: newly generated data from the UK parkinsonism cohort (Parkinson's disease, n=66; progressive supranuclear palsy, n=52; controls, n=9) and previously generated data from the PPMI (Parkinson's disease, n=1036; controls, n=239) and Tübingen (Parkinson's disease, n=229) cohorts. In the UK parkinsonism cohort, α-synuclein SAA was positive in 63 (96%) of 66 Parkinson's disease samples and eight (15%) of 52 progressive supranuclear palsy samples, with six (75%) of eight positive progressive supranuclear palsy samples having distinct low and slow seeding kinetics (low MaxThT and high TTT) as a marker of Lewy body co-pathology. TTT was faster in GBA1-associated Parkinson's disease compared with sporadic Parkinson's disease in both the PPMI (p=0·04) and Tübingen (p=0·01) cohorts. In the PPMI cohort, after excluding individuals who had an unfavourable outcome at the time of baseline SAA testing, an unfavourable outcome was observed in 593 (73%) of 810 participants with α-synuclein SAA-positive Parkinson's disease during a median follow-up period of 4·5 years (IQR 2-9). TTT at baseline predicted only cognitive decline (Montreal Cognitive Assessment score ≤21) as a component of an unfavourable outcome in Parkinson's disease in both the PPMI (n=824, hazard ratio [HR] 2·36 [95% CI 1·60-3·46], p=0·001) and Tübingen (n=135, 2·17 [1·07-4·41], p=0·03) cohorts. TTT also predicted cognitive decline in a subgroup of participants with Parkinson's disease in the PPMI cohort who were Alzheimer's disease biomarker negative (n=355, HR 1·80 [95% CI 1·03-3·18], p=0·04). INTERPRETATION: Assessing α-synuclein SAA kinetic measures might aid in the diagnostic differentiation of Parkinson's disease from progressive supranuclear palsy with Lewy body co-pathology. Furthermore, faster seeding kinetics are found in GBA1-Parkinson's disease and predict cognitive decline in Parkinson's disease independently of Alzheimer's disease co-pathology. FUNDING: Medical Research Council, PSP Association. COPYRIGHT: © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".