MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411363848 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2024-0239

Experimental investigation of corroded steel H-pile repaired with ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) under eccentric axial compression loads

2025· article· en· W4411363848 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Binod Shrestha, Mohanad M. Abdulazeez, Mohamed A. ElGawady

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Corrosion and Durability
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMid-America Transportation Center, University of Nebraska-LincolnMissouri Department of Transportation
KeywordsStructural engineeringPileMaterials scienceCompression (physics)EccentricComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Corrosion-induced deterioration in steel H-piles reduces load-carrying capacity and structural performance. Replacing corroded H-piles is often impractical due to cost and accessibility constraints. This paper investigates the effectiveness of repairing severely corroded H-piles subjected to eccentric axial loads using ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) plates. The UHPC plates, reinforced with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) grids, are bolted to the steel H-piles using high-strength bolt connectors (HSBCs). Nine full-scale 120 in. (3048 mm) long H-piles HP10×42 were repaired with UHPC plates and subjected to axial compression loads at eccentricities of 0%, 10%, and 30%. Corrosion was simulated by reducing the thickness of the flanges and web, creating cuts and voids. The repaired piled with 0.75 in. (19 mm) diameter HSBC displayed a strength increase of 348% while those with 1 in. (25.4 mm) diameter HSBC and CFRP grid exhibited a 422% increment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicConcrete Corrosion and DurabilityFrench-language works237,207