MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411366419 · doi:10.61756/tihf9510

Liberté, Volume 4: Première édition canadienne

2025· book· en· W4411366419 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Enzo Le Doze, Olivia Bazot, Juliette Valcke, Alexandra Tsedryk, L.E. Steele, Gretchen Angelo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVolume (thermodynamics)PhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Liberté, Volume 4: Première édition canadienne is a textbook for intermediate level 2 university students studying French. The textbook was originally created by Gretchen V. Angelo for American students. The first Canadian edition is an online open-source manual created based upon Dr. Angelo’s version by faculty and students of the Department of Modern Languages of Mount Saint Vincent University in Halifax (Canada). The online edition is enhanced with supplementary activities that accompany each chapter. These have been developed to expand students’ knowledge of French culture in Canada and around the world. They are enriched with videos, as well as French-Canadian music. Also, plenty of interactive exercises can be found in this online edition to help students practice vocabulary and grammatical concepts taught in each chapter. The exercises follow the order in which the material is presented in each chapter. Volume 4 includes chapters 10-12 of the original Liberté, as well as additional materials and interactive exercises. Each volume can be used to teach French language during one term at the university level with two classes per week.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1990.119

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSocial Sciences and Governance→French-language works237,207→