Estrategia de recuperación de Leptocereus scopulophilus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leptocereus scopulophilus is a columnar, tree-like cactus endemic to Mayabeque and Matanzas in western Cuba. The species is considered Critically Endangered due to its limited area of occupancy. It has been heavily affected by quarrying, which led to its extinction at its type locality, Loma Somorrostro. Landslides, fires, fungal attacks, livestock grazing, and invasive exotic species are the main threats faced by the species. Given its critical conservation status, this recovery strategy aims to: achieve a positive population growth for L. scopulophilus by establishing new subpopulations within the next 10 years, reduce the degradation of the Puerto Escondido subpopulation, and include the localities of Puerto Escondido and Pan de Matanzas within the Canasí-Puerto Escondido and Lomas de Galindo Managed Floristic Reserves, respectively. The primary challenges for this strategy include the fact that the species' distribution area is owned by entities with interests misaligned with conservation. These areas lack conservation zones, and there is a high probability that such localities cannot be included within protected areas. Another limiting factor is the absence of local leaders to support recovery actions. The success of this strategy also depends on ensuring the continuity of its implementation. Achieving the recovery of the species and meeting the proposed objectives requires sustaining actions for at least a decade to observe lasting changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".