Enhancing cerebral infarct classification by automatically extracting relevant fMRI features
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate detection of cortical infarct is critical for timely treatment and improved patient outcomes. Current brain imaging methods often require invasive procedures that primarily assess blood vessel and structural white matter damage. There is a need for non-invasive approaches, such as functional MRI (fMRI), that better reflect neuronal viability. This study utilized automated machine learning (auto-ML) techniques to identify novel infarct-specific fMRI biomarkers specifically related to chronic cortical infarcts. We analyzed resting-state fMRI data from the multi-center ADNI dataset, which included 20 chronic infarct patients and 30 cognitively normal (CN) controls. This study utilized automated machine learning (auto-ML) techniques to identify novel fMRI biomarkers specifically related to chronic cortical infarcts. Surface-based registration methods were applied to minimize partial-volume effects typically associated with lower resolution fMRI data. We evaluated the performance of 7 previously known fMRI biomarkers alongside 107 new auto-generated fMRI biomarkers across 33 different classification models. Our analysis identified 6 new fMRI biomarkers that substantially improved infarct detection performance compared to previously established metrics. The best-performing combination of biomarkers and classifiers achieved a cross-validation ROC score of 0.791, closely matching the accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging methods used in acute stroke detection. Our proposed auto-ML fMRI infarct-detection technique demonstrated robustness across diverse imaging sites and scanner types, highlighting the potential of automated feature extraction to significantly enhance non-invasive infarct detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".