MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411370044 · doi:10.1016/j.eats.2025.103675

Why 6 Fingers Are Better Than 5! The Versatility and Utility of the Sixth Finger Knot Pusher in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery

2025· article· en· W4411370044 on OpenAlexaff
Mustafa S. Rashid, Georgios Mamarelis, Michele Novak, Ian K.Y. Lo

Bibliographic record

VenueArthroscopy Techniques · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder and Clavicle Injuries
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineKnot (papermaking)SurgeryShoulder surgeryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arthroscopic knot tying in shoulder surgery offers the surgeon versatility and security when performing certain procedures. While knotless techniques have become popular, the young surgeon should develop and maintain their knot-tying skills. The surgeon's knot has been shown to offer the best loop and knot security on testing. The sixth finger knot pusher is a double-lumen knot pusher that permits tying the arthroscopic surgeon's knot, while offering a number of advantages over a traditional knot pusher. Its utility in shoulder surgery, as well as its advantages and disadvantages, are discussed in this Technical Note.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthroscopy TechniquesSame topicShoulder and Clavicle InjuriesFrench-language works237,207