FAUST
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Context. The (sub-)millimetre dust opacity spectral index (β) is a critical observable for constraining dust properties, such as the maximum grain size of an observed dust population. It has been widely measured at Galactic scales and down to protoplanetary disks. Because of observational and analytical challenges, however, quite a gap exists in following the evolution of dust in the interstellar medium (ISM): we lack measures of the dust properties in the envelopes that feed newborn protostars and their disks. Aims. To fill this gap, we used sensitive dust continuum emission data at 1.2 and 3.1 mm from the ALMA FAUST Large Program and constrained the spectral index of the submillimetre dust opacity for a sample of protostars. Methods. Our high-resolution data, along with a method that was more refined than the methods in previous efforts, allowed us to distinguish the contributions from the disk and envelope in the uv-plane, and thus, to measure spectral indices for the envelopes that are not contaminated by the optically thick emission of the inner disk regions. Results. The FAUST sources (n = 13) include a variety of morphologies in continuum emission: compact young disks, extended collapsing envelopes, and dusty outflow cavity walls. Firstly, we found that the young disks in our sample are small (down to < 9 au) and optically thick. Secondly, we measured the dust opacity spectral index β at envelope scales for n = 11 sources: The β of n = 9 of these sources were not constrained before. We effectively doubled the number of sources for which the dust opacity spectral index β has been measured at these scales. Thirdly, by combining the available literature measurements with our own (a total n = 18), we showed the distribution of the envelope spectral indices between ISM-like and disk-like values. This bridges the gap in the inferred dust evolution. Finally, we statistically confirmed a significant correlation between β and the mass of protostellar envelopes, as previously suggested in the literature. Conclusions. Our findings indicate that the optical dust properties smoothly vary from the ISM (≫ 0.1 parsec) through envelopes (∼ 500–2000 au) to protoplanetary disks (< 200 au). Multi-wavelength surveys including longer wavelengths and in controlled starforming regions are needed to further this study and make more general claims about the dust evolution in its pathway from the cloud to disks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.465 | 0.294 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".