Crossover operators for molecular graphs with an application to virtual drug screening
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genetic algorithms are a powerful method to solve optimization problems with complex cost functions over vast search spaces that rely in particular on recombining parts of previous solutions. Crossover operators play a crucial role in this context. Here, we describe a large class of these operators designed for searching over spaces of graphs. These operators are based on introducing small cuts into graphs and rejoining the resulting induced subgraphs of two parents. This form of cut-and-join crossover can be restricted in a consistent way to preserve local properties such as vertex-degrees (valency), or bond-orders, as well as global properties such as graph-theoretic planarity. In contrast to crossover on strings, cut-and-join crossover on graphs is powerful enough to ergodically explore chemical space even in the absence of mutation operators. Extensive benchmarking shows that the offspring of molecular graphs are again plausible molecules with high probability, while at the same time crossover drastically increases the diversity compared to initial molecule libraries. Moreover, desirable properties such as favorable indices of synthesizability are preserved with sufficient frequency that candidate offsprings can be filtered efficiently for such properties. As an application we utilized the cut-and-join crossover in REvoLd, a GA-based system for computer-aided drug design. In optimization runs searching for ligands binding to four different target proteins we consistently found candidate molecules with binding constants exceeding the best known binders as well as candidates found in make-on-demand libraries.Scientific contributionWe define cut-and-join crossover operators on a variety of graph classes including molecular graphs. This constitutes a mathematically simple and well-characterized approach to recombination of molecules that performed very well in real-life CADD tasks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".