MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411373302 · doi:10.62366/crebss.2025.1.002

The impact of population ageing on economic growth in developing countries

2025· article· en· W4411373302 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dekkiche Djamal

Bibliographic record

VenueCroatian Review of Economic Business and Social Statistics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Care Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgeingPopulation ageingDeveloping countryDevelopment economicsPopulationEconomicsEconomic geographyEconomic growthMedicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study aims to analyse the economic effects of population ageing in Japan, Spain, Italy, the United States, South Korea, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Canada using the panel ARDL (Autoregressive Distributed Lag) model. GDP per capita was adopted as the dependent variable, while the independent variables included the proportion of the population over 65, health expenditure, the dependency rate, and the level of investment as a proportion of GDP. The results showed varying effects of ageing on economic growth. It had a positive impact in some of the countries under study (the USA, South Korea, and Germany) and a negative impact in others (Spain, Italy, and Japan). Health spending was also found to be an economic burden, while fixed investment was shown to be critical in supporting economic growth. The study recommends improving education and training to increase productivity, embracing innovation and technology, enhancing health systems through preventive care, and implementing flexible policies, such as encouraging women's participation in the labour market and promoting migration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.402 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCroatian Review of Economic Business and Social StatisticsSame topicGlobal Health Care IssuesFrench-language works237,207