MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411374933 · doi:10.1002/xrs.3501

X‐Ray Study of a MgLi Alloy With a Reflection Zone Plate Spectrometer on an Electron Microprobe

2025· article· en· W4411374933 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Jonnard, Karine Le Guen, Khalil Hassebi, Nicolas Rividi, Omar Boudouma, Raynald Gauvin, Nicolas Brodusch

Bibliographic record

VenueX-Ray Spectrometry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsElectron microprobeMicroprobeReflection (computer programming)Zone plateOpticsSpectrometerAlloyMaterials sciencePhysicsMetallurgyNuclear physicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT A MgLi dilute alloy (6% wt. Li) has been studied by x‐ray emission spectroscopy in the ultra‐soft x‐ray range, 40–60 eV. For this purpose, a high‐resolution reflection zone plate spectrometer, working as a variable line grating spectrometer, was used on an electron probe microanalyser. With the experimental conditions, current and acceleration voltage of the incident electron beam, geometry, CCD detection, the Mg L emission band is easily observed. The Fermi edge of this band shifts toward the low photon energies with the Li content. The Li K emission band is hardly detectable despite the non‐negligible lithium mass fraction in the alloy. This is explained by the reabsorption of the lithium emission by the magnesium atoms, the reabsorption effect being strong in the present geometrical conditions of the experiment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueX-Ray SpectrometrySame topicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207