Trend Transformation in Population Administration in Indonesia: A Bibliometric Analysis 2012-2024
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to analyze trends in public service innovation and population administration using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology.The focus of the research problem includes the distribution of articles per year, types of research, targets of innovation, geographical distribution of articles, most cited articles, and dominant fields of study.Articles were selected through a systematic selection process using inclusion criteria related to public service innovation and demographics.After screening, the articles were analyzed based on annual distribution patterns, types of research, and innovation targets.The research results show a significant increase in the number of articles related to public service innovation since 2019, peaking in 2022 and 2023, before experiencing a decline in 2024.The analysis type has become the most dominant type of research (125 articles), while experiments and model development are used less frequently.Society is the main target of innovation (103 articles), while the government and academic sectors are relatively underrepresented.In terms of geographical distribution, South Sulawesi dominates with the highest number of articles, while several other provinces have very little contribution.The most cited articles focus on technology-based innovations, such as egovernment and public service applications.Overall, this research reveals that public service innovations tend to focus on the application of technology and involve the community, with an analytical approach dominating the research methodology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | Bibliometrics Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Not applicable | low |
| gpt | Bibliometrics Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Other design | medium |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.054 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".