MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411375296 · doi:10.1121/10.0036948

Parallel tempering in trans-dimensional Bayesian geoacoustic inversion for high-information-content data and multi-parameter models

2025· article· en· W4411375296 on OpenAlexafffund
Stan E. Dosso

Bibliographic record

VenueJASA Express Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsParallel temperingInversion (geology)Bayesian probabilityTemperingSeabedAlgorithmHidden Markov modelComputer scienceMarkov chainMarkov chain Monte CarloGeologyArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMaterials scienceHybrid Monte CarloOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trans-dimensional (trans-D) Bayesian inversion is a powerful approach to estimate seabed geoacoustic models from ocean-acoustic data, combining quantitative model selection and uncertainty estimation. Trans-D inversion samples probabilistically over the number of seabed layers and the geoacoustic parameters for each layer, with layers added and removed in sampling, changing the dimension of the model. However, the probability of accepting dimension changes can approach zero for problems involving highly informative data or large numbers of parameters per layer. This Letter examines the use of parallel tempering, which employs a sequence of interacting Markov chains with successively relaxed likelihoods, to address these challenging cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJASA Express LettersSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207