MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411376409 · doi:10.1049/pel2.70070

Parallel Connected Converters with Interleaved Phase‐Shifted PWM Using a Common Carrier

2025· article· en· W4411376409 on OpenAlex
Wael Telmesani, Gregory J. Kish, John Salmon

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Power Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersPulse-width modulationPhase (matter)Electronic engineeringThree-phaseComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)PhysicsEngineeringVoltageControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT A novel interleaving approach for parallel‐connected dual three‐phase converters using a single unmodified carrier is introduced. This method simplifies implementation by adjusting the phase with an offset added to the reference signal, without altering pulse width modulation (PWM) timing. It effectively controls flux and circulating currents within coupled inductor cores. Conventional schemes face challenges such as high direct current (DC)‐offset in circulating currents, poor line‐voltage quality, and glitches in load currents. They also rely on multiple phase‐shifted carriers that require each leg to have its own carrier signal, adding synchronization complexity. While modern digital controllers can accommodate this, managing synchronization remains a challenge, especially for low‐cost controllers with limited PWM carrier generation. These limitations can restrict the number of parallel legs per phase, affecting scalability. The proposed approach overcomes these issues by using a shared carrier for all modulators and adjusting the reference signal to achieve the required phase shift, ensuring high‐quality line voltage and glitch‐free load currents while simplifying implementation. This approach enhances flexibility in phase shift and duty cycle control while eliminating DC‐offset in flux and circulating currents, reducing magnetic component size via a simple reference signal adjustment at zero‐crossing. Feasibility is validated across low and high frequencies through analysis, simulations, and experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it