MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411376505 · doi:10.1111/eff.70012

River Flow Regime Predicts Life History Traits in Poeciliid Fish

2025· article· en· W4411376505 on OpenAlexaff
Raphaela Batista dos Santos, Luciana Lameira dos Santos, Romullo Guimarães de Sá Ferreira Lima, Bruno Eleres Soares, Carla Ferreira Rezende, José Roberto Feitosa Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueEcology Of Freshwater Fish · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersFundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsFish <Actinopterygii>Life history theoryBiologyEcologyLife historyFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Life history theory seeks to explain how the environment shapes life history traits. Based on this theory, we expected that Poecilia vivipara in rivers with intermittent and perennial flow regimes would show differences in maturation and reproductive investment. We sampled specimens from two rivers in the Brazilian semi‐arid region with these contrasting river flow regimes. One is intermittent, where the flow ceases during the dry season and fish populations become confined to isolated pools on the riverbed, and the other is artificially perennial with continuous flow. We predicted that females would mature earlier and invest more in reproduction in the intermittent river than in the perennial river. Our findings supported the predictions; river intermittency apparently has shaped the traits of P. vivipara in natural environments as contrasted with those affected by anthropogenic alterations. Further study is needed to investigate whether these traits reflect genetic differences or phenotypic plasticity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcology Of Freshwater FishSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207