MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411380582 · doi:10.1353/phx.2024.a962120

The Selymbria Affair of 340 B.C.: A Historical Fiction

2024· article· fr· W4411380582 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jeremy Trevett

Bibliographic record

VenuePhoenix · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Near East History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHistoryLiteraturePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Historians are wrong to accept the claims of ancient commentators that Philip of Macedon besieged Selymbria in 340 b.c. and wrote a letter to the Athenians complaining about their support for that city. This material derives from the forged documents in Demosthenes' speech On the Crown and is worthless as historical evidence. Abstract: Les historiens ont tort d'accepter les allégations des commentateurs antiques selon lesquelles Philippe de Macédoine aurait assiégé Sélymbrie en 340 av. j.-c. et aurait écrit aux Athéniens pour se plaindre du soutien qu'ils apportaient à cette ville. Les preuves sur lesquelles ils se basent proviennent des faux documents inclus dans le discours de Démosthène Sur la couronne et n'ont aucune valeur historique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhoenixSame topicAncient Near East HistoryFrench-language works237,207