MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411380649 · doi:10.1353/phx.2024.a962121

The Achaean War, Paus. 7.14.1, and Rome's Revocation of Territorial Grants

2024· article· fr· W4411380649 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hongyu Sun

Bibliographic record

VenuePhoenix · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRevocationPolitical scienceHistoryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Pausanias reports that in 147 b.c., Rome requested the Achaean League to surrender five cities. This paper argues that, from Rome's perspective, these cities were her war prizes, which she had allowed the League to keep as rewards. Rome's demand was, essentially, a revocation of territorial grants. Abstract: Pausanias rapporte qu'en 147 av. j.-c. Rome aurait exigé de la Ligue achéenne qu'elle lui abandonne cinq cités. Cet article soutient que, du point de vue de Rome, ces cités représentaient des trophées de guerre qu'elle avait permis à la Ligue de garder comme récompense. En substance, la requête de Rome révoquait une concession territoriale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhoenixSame topicArchaeology and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207