MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411389163 · doi:10.3389/frvir.2025.1588181

Virtual reality-based exposure with 360° video as part of cognitive behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder: a three-arm randomized controlled trial

2025· article· en· W4411389163 on OpenAlexaff
Per Trads Ørskov, Eik Runge, Trine Theresa Holmberg Sainte-Marie, Mathias Torp Ernst, Lars Clemmensen, Caroline Dalsgaard, Mia Beck Lichtenstein, Stéphane Bouchard

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Virtual Reality · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDigital Mental Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisCégep de l'Outaouais
FundersKlinisk Institut, Syddansk UniversitetSyddansk UniversitetOdense Universitetshospital
KeywordsSocial anxietyRandomized controlled trialAnxietyVirtual realityPsychologyVirtual Reality Exposure TherapyPsychotherapistExposure therapyCognitive behavioral therapyCognitionClinical psychologyMedicineComputer scienceHuman–computer interactionPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Social anxiety disorder (SAD) has a high prevalence and an early onset. It often persists well into adulthood, turning into a chronic disorder. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is effective in treating SAD, but real-life exposure conducted as part of CBT is often costly and time-consuming, and imaginary exposure might lack realism and intensity. Virtual reality (VR)-based exposure using 360° video offers a promising way to deliver exposure therapy. Objective To develop a complete psychotherapeutic treatment program including CBT with VR-based exposure using 360° videos (CBT-ExpVR) for adult patients with SAD and to test the treatment effect using the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) as the primary outcome. Methods This three-arm randomized controlled trial involved 51 participants who were recruited through self-referral. The interventions took place at Center for Digital Psychiatry in Denmark. Participants were randomized via computer program to CBT-ExpVR, CBT with in vivo exposure (CBT-Exp), or an active control group offered VR relaxation (RlxVR). Afterwards, participants assigned to RlxVR were re-randomized to one of the two CBT interventions. Allocation was not blinded. Results Intention-to-treat analysis showed that participants receiving CBT-ExpVR reported significantly fewer symptoms of social anxiety at post-treatment compared to pre-treatment, β = −14.89, 95% CI (−18.64, −11.14), p < 0.0001. At post-treatment, no difference in treatment effect was found between CBT-ExpVR and CBT-Exp, β = 3.643, 95% CI (−1.727, 9.013), p = 0.1839. However, CBT-ExpVR was more effective than RlxVR, β = −11.537, 95% CI (−16.163, −6.911), p < 0.0001. Dropout rates post-treatment were 16% (CBT-ExpVR), 38% (CBT-Exp), and 20% (RlxVR). No harms were registered during the study. Conclusion CBT-ExpVR represents an effective treatment for SAD comparable to standard CBT treatment. CBT-ExpVR was reported as less costly and requiring less effort by the therapist compared to CBT-Exp. Thus, VR-based exposure might pave the way for a broader implementation of exposure in psychotherapeutic interventions for social anxiety by providing easy and low-cost access to exposure scenarios. Clinical Trials Registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03973541 , identifier NCT03973541.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Virtual RealitySame topicDigital Mental Health InterventionsFrench-language works237,207