MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411390783 · doi:10.53762/20yf3079

10.53762/20yf3079

2000· article· en· W4411390783 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Ghazi Abdul Rehman Qasmi, Muhammad Husnain

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIslamic Thought and Society Studies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The holy Quran discusses principles and it often does so with brevity. And the details and explanation of these principles is expounded by Aḥādith. But the Holy Quran explains the principles where necessary. So where the Holy Quran discusses different topics & matter, It also elaborates the principles of Daᶜwat-e-Dīn. By following the principles, set by the holy Quran, the Holy prophet P.B.U.H. preached Daᶜwat-e-Dīn. The effective method Preach Daᶜwat-e-Dīn adopted by the Holy Prophet is the only way to be followed in order to convey the principles of Quran effectively. In this article, we have discussed the principles of Daᶜwat-e-Dīn described by the Holy Quran and how the Holy Prophet has implemented these principles in connection with Daᶜwat-e-Dīn.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9960.976

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicIslamic Thought and Society StudiesFrench-language works237,207