MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411391064 · doi:10.53762/qqmw5g09

10.53762/qqmw5g09

2000· article· en· W4411391064 on OpenAlex
Fatima, Muhammad Fakhar ud din

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the age of Jahiliyyah, the women were deprived of all their rights and were considered as a go head over heels thing in the society, but when Islam appeared, it not only gave women a high position but also gave them all the rights like men. Like a man, a woman was also given the right of ownership, the right of acquisition, economic and financial rights, and among these economic and financial rights, she gave the right of inheritance, in such a way that the share of the man was determined by making the woman's share the basis. It is a privilege that no other religion has given except Islam. Considering Islamic teachings and Pakistani laws and constitution; we have researched the society of Bannu district (which is a Pashtun society). And came to the results that, the practical situation of our society is also sad and based on oppression. Very cruel factors and pretexts are used to deprive the women. As a Muslim nation, we have turned our backs on this precious and privileged legal right of Islam, which Allah Almighty has declared as Hududullah.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9910.955

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.148
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it