MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411391623 · doi:10.1002/pd.6838

Occipital Cephalocele, Polymicrogyria, Ocular Anomaly and Vermian Dysplasia: Prenatal Markers for Knobloch Syndrome

2025· article· en· W4411391623 on OpenAlexaff
Laurence Carmant, Elka Miller, David Chitayat, Stephanie Hedges, Bobbi McGivern, Kimberly G. Harris, Karen Chong, Shiri Shinar

Bibliographic record

VenuePrenatal Diagnosis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMoyamoya disease diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolymicrogyriaExome sequencingEncephaloceleMedicineNeuroimagingCortical dysplasiaDysplasiaPathologyPrenatal diagnosisFetusAnatomyMagnetic resonance imagingPregnancyBiologyGeneticsRadiologyMutationPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knobloch Syndrome-1 is a rare autosomal recessive disorder typically diagnosed postnatally and characterized by occipital encephalocele, high myopia, and vitreoretinal degeneration. We describe a fetus with a constellation of prenatal neuroimaging findings, including occipital cephalocele, vermian dysplasia, bilateral polymicrogyria, and ocular elongation, that prompted genetic investigation. Trio exome sequencing identified biallelic pathogenic variants in COL18A1, confirming the diagnosis of Knobloch Syndrome-1. This case highlights how advanced fetal neuroimaging and prenatal exome sequencing can facilitate early recognition of syndromes like Knobloch, and underscores the importance of considering COL18A1-related disorders when multiple central nervous system anomalies are detected prenatally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePrenatal DiagnosisSame topicMoyamoya disease diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207