MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411395880 · doi:10.53762/xd2dx106

10.53762/xd2dx106

2000· article· en· W4411395880 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Farooq Amir, Mazhar Hussain Bhadroo, Muhammad Shahid Habib

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Islamic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamLineage (genetic)RationalitySociologyReligious studiesHistoryPhilosophyPolitical scienceArchaeologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The lineage of the Khairabad family goes back to the Great Caliph of Islam Umar bin Khattab (RA) Bahauddin and Shamsuddin, the two brothers from his generation, came to the subcontinent fromIran. The Shamsuddin possessed the seat of Rohtak Ifta while the Bahauddin settled in the Badayun. Allama Fazal Imam Khairabadi (1829) is from the descendants of Bahauddin. His lineage is known as Khanawada-e-Khairabad, while the intro of his students is known as Madrasah Khairabad. The scholarly genealogy of the Khairabad family goes back to the scholars of Farangi Mahal. Allama Fazal Haq Khairabadi (1861), is the most popular name of the Khairabad family, who introduced the Khairabad family in the world. He learned the knowledge of Hadith from Shah Abdul Qadir Muhaddith Dehlvi (1815) and Shah Abdul Aziz Muhaddith Dehlvi (1824). The Khairabad family established the School, which gained fame in the regions andcountryside of India as teaching of rationality. The scholars of Khairabad put valuable services inwriting and compilation the different books. Allama Fazl Imam Khairabadi, Allama Fazl Haq Khairabadi ,and Allama Abdul Haq Khairabadi (1899) are worth mentioning in the Khairabad family.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9760.987

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knit→Same topicEducation and Islamic Studies→French-language works237,207→