Bibliographic record
Abstract
Islam is a complete code of life. It has given sanctity and importance to human life. The holy Quran announces, “We have bestowed dignity on the children of Adam” (Quran 17:70). Similarly, the life of an individual has been granted such a significance that according to the Quran, if anyone killed a person without any reason, it would be as if he killed all mankind and saving one life would be equal to saving of whole humanity (Quran 5:32). In the light of such instructions, one can easily imagine the sacredness of human life in Islam. Unfortunately, in Pakistan and other parts of the world, suicide has become very common and it is especially highest in the teens and young adults. In Islam, suicide is strictly forbidden and no one has any right to end his life. This study tries to look into different methods commonly adopted for committing suicide and Islamic teachings to curb this menace from the society. It also endeavors to show that Islam is a religion of hope and emphasizes on the believers to trust in Allah Almighty and struggle hard to achieve the goals. Islamic teachings leave no room for any frustration and hopelessness in life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.988 | 0.988 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".