MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411396345 · doi:10.53762/wf755h03

10.53762/wf755h03

2000· article· en· W4411396345 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ume Farwa, Farhat Nisar

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Islamic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpretation (philosophy)Order (exchange)Context (archaeology)SufismPreferencePhilosophyEpistemologyLiteratureHistoryTheologyIslamLinguisticsArtMathematicsArchaeologyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Qazi Sanaullah Pani Patti was one of the eminent scholars of subcontinent. He belonged to the Mujaddidi order of Sufism, which is the main branch of Naqshbandi Sufi tariqah. He was the author of many books. One of the major contribution by Qazi Sanaullah is in the field of Tafseer. He wrote a famous tafseer on the name of one of his teachers Mazhar Jane Janan. Name of the tafseer is “Tafseer e Mazhari”. In the given research article I have discussed the ways Qazi Sanaullah prefers opinions of some scholars over opinions of other scholars in his tafseer. As rules of preferences is a great concern for those interpreting the words of Quran because this requires careful consideration and thought in the context of different opinions, and linking them to reach a conclusion, similarly it necessitates for the exegetes that these rules be in the light of Quran and Sunnah and not their personal opinions. This research paper discusses the ways of preference used by Qazi Sanaullah.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9840.984

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicEducation and Islamic StudiesFrench-language works237,207