Bibliographic record
Abstract
The beginning of an imaginary tradition in modern Arabic literature is part of a broader process of restoration and cultural integration. The process involved the creative fusion of two separate forces. One is the rediscovery of the treasures of the Arabic literary heritage and the creation of a "neo-classical" movement. The second is the creation of European fiction in Arabic, their adaptation and imitation, and the final form of the indigenous tradition of modern Arabic fiction. Jurji Zaydan (1861-1914), was an Arabic-Egyptian writer and a well known fictional novelist, journalist, editor and a teacher, and wass far famous Due to its wide serial "Al-Hilal" which contains 23 novels. During Nahda(A cultural movement that flourished in Arabic regions such as: Egypt, Lebanon and Syria in the end of 19th and the start of 20th century.), his motto was to spread the entertainment through Novel to the majority of Arab with their own history. One novel inspired by his thought is "Sultan Salahuddin Ayubi", Within it, there is a fiction like love aspects, as well as distorted history. In order to know the artistic status of this novel, this study will examine it in the style of Arab writers to help new scholars to examine its further works in the same vein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.983 | 0.984 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".